• Xin Xu, Michael F Pesko, Michael A Tynan, Robert B Gerzoff, Ann M Malarcher, and Terry F Pechacek.
• Office on Smoking and Health, CDC, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA. xinxu@cdc.gov
• Am J Prev Med. 2013 May 1; 44 (5): 472476472-6.

BackgroundSmokers may react to cigarette excise tax increases by engaging in price-minimization strategies (i.e., finding ways to reduce the cost of cigarette smoking) rather than by quitting or reducing their cigarette use, thereby reducing the public health benefits of such tax increases.PurposeTo evaluate the state and national prevalence of five common cigarette price-minimization strategies and the size of price reductions obtained from these strategies.MethodsUsing data from the 2009-2010 National Adult Tobacco Survey, the prevalence of five common price-minimization strategies by type of strategy and by smoker's cigarette consumption level were estimated. The price reductions associated with these price-minimization strategies also were evaluated. Analyses took place in November 2012.ResultsApproximately 55.4% of U.S. adult smokers used at least one of five price-minimization strategies in the previous year, with an average reduction of $1.27 per pack (22.0%). Results varied widely by state.ConclusionsCigarette price-minimization strategies are practiced widely among current smokers, and resulting price reductions are relatively large. Policies that decrease opportunities to effectively apply cigarette price-minimization strategies would increase the public health gains of cigarette excise tax increases.Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Journal of Preventive Medicine.

12 keywords...

hide…