• Clare Hayes-Bradley, Michael McCreery, Ashleigh Delorenzo, Jason Bendall, Anthony Lewis, and Kelly-Ann Bowles.
• Department of Paramedicine, Monash University, Frankston, VIC, Australia; NSW Ambulance Aeromedical Operations, Sydney, NSW, Australia. Electronic address: clare.hayes-bradley@monash.edu.
• Br J Anaesth. 2024 May 1; 132 (5): 918935918-935.

BackgroundPrehospital rapid sequence intubation first pass success rates vary between 59% and 98%. Patient morbidity is associated with repeat intubation attempts. Understanding what influences first pass success can guide improvements in practice. We performed an aetiology and risk systematic review to answer the research question 'what factors are associated with success or failure at first attempt laryngoscopy in prehospital rapid sequence intubation?'.MethodsMEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library were searched on March 3, 2023 for studies examining first pass success rates for rapid sequence intubation of prehospital live patients. Screening was performed via Covidence, and data synthesised by meta-analysis. The review was registered with PROSPERO and performed and reported as per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.ResultsReasonable evidence was discovered for predictive and protective factors for failure of first pass intubation. Predictive factors included age younger than 1 yr, the presence of blood or fluid in the airway, restricted jaw or neck movement, trauma patients, nighttime procedures, chronic or acute distortions of normal face/upper airway anatomy, and equipment issues. Protective factors included an experienced intubator, adequate training, use of certain videolaryngoscopes, elevating the patient on a stretcher in an inclined position, use of a bougie, and laryngeal manoeuvres.ConclusionsManaging bloody airways, positioning well, using videolaryngoscopes with bougies, and appropriate training should be further explored as opportunities for prehospital services to increase first pass success. Heterogeneity of studies limits stronger conclusions.Systematic Review ProtocolPROSPERO (CRD42022353609).Copyright © 2024 British Journal of Anaesthesia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

24 keywords...

hide…