-
J Pain Symptom Manage · Jun 2024
Pragmatic Clinical TrialPandemic Effects on Stability of End-of-Life Preferences and Patient-Surrogate Dyad Congruence.
- Mi-Kyung Song, Sudeshna Paul, Jordan Pelkmans, and Sandra E Ward.
- Center for Nursing Excellence in Palliative Care (M.K.S.), Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. Electronic address: mi-kyung.song@emory.edu.
- J Pain Symptom Manage. 2024 Jun 1; 67 (6): 571579.e2571-579.e2.
ContextWhether a largescale disaster alters people's previous decisions about their end-of-life care is unknown.ObjectivesWe examined the effects of a disaster, the COVID-19 pandemic, on stability of end-of-life care preferences among dialysis patients and on patient-surrogate goals-of-care congruence.MethodsWe used a natural experimental design to examine goals-of-care preferences pre- and postexposure to the pandemic during a pragmatic trial testing SPIRIT (sharing patient's illness representations to increase trust), an evidence-based advance care planning (ACP) intervention. There were 151 patient-surrogate dyads who prior to the pandemic lockdown had completed baseline (T1) and postintervention assessments (T2) regarding their goals-of-care preferences in two end-of-life scenarios. Of those 151 dyads, 59 intervention, and 51 usual care dyads consented to be in the present study and completed the goals-of-care tool two additional times, at enrollment (T3) and six months later (T4), along with the COVID stress scale (CSS). Dyad congruence was ascertained by comparing patient and surrogate responses to the goals-of-care tool.ResultsThere were no changes over time in the proportions of patients who chose comfort-care-only in the goals-of-care tool. The proportion of patients who chose comfort-care-only and dyad congruence were higher in SPIRIT compared to usual care, but there was no interaction between that treatment effect and exposure to the pandemic. CSS was associated with neither patients' preferences nor dyad congruence.ConclusionsThe pandemic alone did not appear to influence patients' goals-of-care preferences or dyad congruence. This finding supports the stability of value-based end-of-life preferences in general, even during a disaster.Copyright © 2024 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.