-
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg · Aug 2024
Cast immobilization duration for distal radius fractures, a systematic review.
- Marcel A N de Bruijn, Laura A van Ginkel, Emily Z Boersma, Lysanne van Silfhout, Tjarda N Tromp, Erik van de Krol, EdwardsMichael J RMJRDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, Postbox 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands., StirlerVincent M AVMADepartment of Trauma Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, Postbox 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.Military Health Organisation, Ministry of Defense, Kromhout Kazerne, Utrecht, The Netherlands, and Erik Hermans.
- Department of Trauma Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, Postbox 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. marcel.debruijn@radboudumc.nl.
- Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Aug 1; 50 (4): 162116361621-1636.
PurposeThe optimal duration of immobilization for the conservative treatment of non- or minimally displaced and displaced distal radius fractures remains under debate. This research aims to review studies of these treatments to add evidence regarding the optimal immobilization period.MethodsA comprehensive database search was conducted. Studies investigating and comparing short (< 3 weeks) versus long (> 3 weeks) immobilizations for the conservative treatment of distal radius fractures were included. The studies were evaluated for radiological and functional outcomes, including pain, grip strength, and range of motion. Two reviewers independently reviewed all studies and performed the data extraction.ResultsThe initial database search identified 11.981 studies, of which 16 (involving 1.118 patients) were ultimately included. Patient-reported outcome measurements, grip strength, range of motion, and radiological outcomes were often better after shorter immobilization treatments. Radiological outcomes were better with longer immobilization in two studies and shorter immobilization in one study. Fourteen studies concluded that early mobilization is preferred, while the remaining two studies observed better outcomes with longer immobilization. The data were unsuitable for meta-analysis due to their heterogeneous nature.ConclusionShorter immobilization for conservatively treated distal radius fractures often yield equal or better outcomes than longer immobilizations. The immobilization for non- or minimally displaced distal radius fractures could therefore be shortened to 3 weeks or less. Displaced and reduced distal radius fractures cannot be immobilized shorter than 4 weeks due to the risk of complications. Future research with homogeneous groups could elucidate the optimal duration of immobilization.© 2024. The Author(s).
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.