• Medicine · May 2018

    Meta Analysis

    Clinical efficacy of xenon versus propofol: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

    • Yimeng Xia, Hongwei Fang, Jindong Xu, Chenfei Jia, Guorong Tao, and Buwei Yu.
    • Department of Anaesthesiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Unit, Dongfang Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicin... more e, Shanghai Department of Anaesthesiology, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute & Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China. less
    • Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 May 1; 97 (20): e10758e10758.

    BackgroundInterest in the anesthetic use of xenon, a noble gas, has waxed and waned for decades, and the clinical effects of xenon are still debated. We performed a meta-analysis to compare the clinical efficacy of xenon with that of propofol.MethodsElectronic searches were performed through December 2017 using various databases, including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. We identified thirteen trials that included a total of 817 patients.ResultsPatients treated with xenon had a lower bispectral index (BIS) (weighted mean difference (WMD): -6.26, 95% confidence interval (CI): -11.33 to -1.18, P = .02), a higher mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) (WMD: 7.00, 95% CI: 2.32-11.68, P = .003) and a lower heart rate (HR) (WMD: -9.45, 95% CI: -12.28 to -6.63, P < 0.00001) than propofol-treated patients. However, there were no significant differences between the 2 treatment groups in the effects of nondepolarizing muscular relaxants, the duration spent in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) (WMD: -0.94, 95% CI: -8.79-6.91, P = .81), or the incidence of perioperative complications [assessed using the outcomes of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) (relative risk (RR): 2.01, 95% CI: 0.79-5.11, P = .14), hypotension (RR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.27 to 1.40, P = .25), hypertension (RR: 1.27, 95% CI: 0.73-2.21, P = .39) and bradycardia (RR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.36-2.74, P = 1.00)].ConclusionIn this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, we found that xenon treatment resulted in a higher MAP, a lower HR, and a smaller BIS index than treatment with propofol.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.