• Boogyung Seo, William Rioux, Nathan Rider, Adrian Teare, Stephanie Jones, Pamela Taplay, and GhoshS MontySM0000-0002-1566-0015Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada. ghosh@ualberta.ca.Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB,.
• Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
• J Urban Health. 2024 Apr 1; 101 (2): 252261252-261.

AbstractThe COVID-19 pandemic introduced additional health challenges for people who use substances (PWUS) amid the overdose crisis. Numerous harm reduction services, including supervised consumption sites (SCS) across Canada, faced shutdowns and reduced operating capacity in order to comply with public health measures. Mobile Overdose Response Services (MORS) are novel overdose prevention technologies that allow those who are unable to access alternative means of harm reduction to consume substances under the virtual supervision of a trained operator. Here, we examine the role of MORS in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. A total of 59 semi-structured interviews were conducted with the following key interest groups: PWUS, healthcare providers, harm reduction workers, MORS operators, and the general public. Inductive thematic analysis informed by grounded theory was used to identify major themes pertaining to the perception of MORS. As the pandemic shifted the public focus away from harm reduction, many participants viewed MORS as an acceptable strategy to reduce the harms associated with solitary substance and alleviate the sense of isolation driven by social distancing measures. While the pandemic may have increased the utility of MORS, concerns surrounding personal privacy and confidentiality remained. Overall, MORS were perceived as a useful adjunct service to address the unmet needs PWUS during the pandemic and beyond.© 2024. Crown.

23 keywords...

hide…