-
- Tanner J Caverly, Pianpian Cao, Rodney A Hayward, and Rafael Meza.
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research and University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan (T.J.C., R.A.H.).
- Ann. Intern. Med. 2018 Jul 3; 169 (1): 191-9.
BackgroundMany health systems are exploring how to implement low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening programs that are effective and patient-centered.ObjectiveTo examine factors that influence when LDCT screening is preference-sensitive.DesignState-transition microsimulation model.Data SourcesTwo large randomized trials, published decision analyses, and the SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) cancer registry.Target PopulationU.S.-representative sample of simulated patients meeting current U.S. Preventive Services Task Force criteria for screening eligibility.Time HorizonLifetime.PerspectiveIndividual.InterventionLDCT screening annually for 3 years.Outcome MeasuresLifetime quality-adjusted life-year gains and reduction in lung cancer mortality. To examine the effect of preferences on net benefit, disutilities (the "degree of dislike") quantifying the burden of screening and follow-up were varied across a likely range. The effect of varying the rate of false-positive screening results and overdiagnosis associated with screening was also examined.Results Of Base Case AnalysisModerate differences in preferences about the downsides of LDCT screening influenced whether screening was appropriate for eligible persons with annual lung cancer risk less than 0.3% or life expectancy less than 10.5 years. For higher-risk eligible persons with longer life expectancy (roughly 50% of the study population), the benefits of LDCT screening overcame even highly negative views about screening and its downsides.Results Of Sensitivity AnalysisRates of false-positive findings and overdiagnosed lung cancer were not highly influential.LimitationThe quantitative thresholds that were identified may vary depending on the structure of the microsimulation model.ConclusionIdentifying circumstances in which LDCT screening is more versus less preference-sensitive may help clinicians personalize their screening discussions, tailoring to both preferences and clinical benefit.Primary Funding SourceNone.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:

- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.