• Atencion primaria · Feb 2001

    Multicenter Study

    [Validity of new diagnostic criteria for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Impact of its application in a health care area].

    • M Pulgar Suárez, P Gómez Guedes, M Aguado Díaz, S Menéndez Alvarez, A García Garaboa, I Rodríguez González, and C González Peláez.
    • Centros de Salud Natahoyo y Coto, Gijón.
    • Aten Primaria. 2001 Feb 15; 27 (2): 111115111-5.

    ObjectivesTo estimate how the number of diabetics known as type 2 is modified by applying the American Diabetes Association (ADA) new diagnostic criteria. To calculate the sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of the ADA diagnostic criteria.DesignTransversal descriptive study.Scope Of The Study15,451 people belonging to two urban health care centers. 1292 individuals were studied by routine random sampling. SUBJECTS OF THE STUDY: General population between 40 and 75 years of age.MethodReview of clinical histories, selecting the basal glycemias performed over the last three years, considering the last one in the event that more than one existed, and performing the necessary analysis if no data existed. A new glycemia measurement was carried out as well as a glucose tolerance test for those values > or = 110-139. Age, sex, and prior diagnosis of diabetes were also recorded.Measurements And ResultsThe mean age was 56 years, 56.1% were females. Normal glycemias (< 110)--830 individuals (86.2%). The prevalence of diabetes was 10.5% when the WHO criteria were applied and 8.7% when ADA criteria were applied. Sensitivity was 39.29%, specificity was 100%, the positive predictive value was 100% and the negative predictive value was 98.5%. 49 individuals presented an altered basal glycemia (5.5%), 17 of whom (34.7%) were diabetic according to the WHO.ConclusionsThe prevalence of diabetes when the WHO criteria are applied is significantly higher than when ADA criteria are applied (p = 0.000). The basal glycemia value of > or = 126 is less sensitive than the glucose tolerance test. No normoglycemic patient according to the ADA would be diabetic according to the WHO; however the ADA and the WHO classify the non-normoglycemics in different groups. The WHO criteria (scrupulously applied) are the better diagnostic method for diabetes in principle and the glucose tolerance test is a test not to be done away with.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.