• P Jeffrey Brantingham, Miguel Quintana-Navarrete, Clarissa Iliff, Craig D Uchida, and George E Tita.
• Department of Anthropology, University of California, Los Angeles, 341 Haines Hall, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA. branting@ucla.edu.
• J Urban Health. 2024 Apr 1; 101 (2): 272279272-279.

AbstractThe gun assault case fatality rate measures the fraction of shooting victims who die from their wounds. Considerable debate has surrounded whether gun assault case fatality rates have changed over time and what factors may be involved. We use crime event data from Los Angeles to examine the victim and situational correlates of gun assault case fatality rates over time. We estimated log binomial regression models for the probability of death in each year from 2005 to 2021, conditioned on situational and victim characteristics of the crime. Case fatality rates increased by around 1.3% per year between 2005 and 2021 from around 15.9 to 19.7%. Baseline case fatality rates differed systematically by most situational and victim but followed similar temporal trends. Only victim age significantly covaried with the temporal trend in case fatality rates. An individual shot in Los Angeles in 2021 was 23.7% more likely to die than the equivalent victim in 2005. The steady increase in case fatality rates suggests that there were around 394 excess fatalities over what would have occurred if case fatality rates remained at the 2005 level. Increases in the average age of victims over time may contribute to the general temporal trend. We hypothesize that older victims are more likely to be shot indoors where lethal close-range wounds are more likely.© 2024. The Author(s).

25 keywords...

hide…