• Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. · Dec 2024

    Comparative Study

    Severity of Airflow Obstruction Based on FEV1/FVC vs FEV1% of Predicted in the General US Population.

    • Helena Backman, VanfleterenLowie E G WLEGW0000-0002-4387-4096COPD Center, Department of Pulmonary Medicine and Allergology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Acad, David M Mannino, and Magnus Ekström.
    • Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Section for Sustainable Health, the OLIN Unit, Umeå University, Umea, Sweden.
    • Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2024 Dec 1; 210 (11): 130813161308-1316.

    AbstractRationale: According to the Global Initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD), the FEV1/FVC ratio is used to confirm the presence of airflow obstruction in the diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), whereas FEV1 percent predicted normal value (FEV1%pred) is used for grading its severity. The STaging of Airflow obstruction by the FEV1/FVC Ratio (STAR), and its prediction of adverse outcomes, has not been evaluated in general populations. Objectives: To compare the STAR (FEV1/FVC) and the GOLD (FEV1%pred) classifications for the severity of airflow limitation in terms of exertional breathlessness and mortality in the general U.S. population. Methods: Severity stages according to the STAR and GOLD were applied to the multiethnic National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey of 2007-2012, including people ages 18-80 years, using a postbronchodilatory FEV1/FVC ratio of <0.70 to define airflow obstruction in both staging systems. Prevalence of the severity stages STAR 1-4 and GOLD 1-4 was calculated, and associations with breathlessness and mortality were analyzed by multinomial logistic regression and Cox regression, respectively. Measurements and Main Results: STAR versus GOLD severity staging of airflow obstruction showed similar associations with breathlessness and all-cause mortality, regardless of ethnicity and/or race. In those with airflow obstruction, the correlation between the two classification systems was 0.461 (P < 0.001). STAR reclassified 59% of GOLD 2 subjects as having mild airflow obstruction (STAR 1). Compared with GOLD 1, STAR 1 was more clearly differentiated from nonobstruction in terms of both breathlessness and mortality. Conclusions: FEV1/FVC and FEV1%pred as measures of airflow limitation severity show similar predictions of breathlessness and mortality in the adult U.S. population across ethnicity groups. However, Stage 1 differed more clearly from nonobstruction on the basis of FEV1/FVC ratio than FEV1%pred.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…