• Edith Valdez-Martínez, Horacio Márquez-González, and Miguel Bedolla.
• Unidad de Investigación Médica en Epidemiología Clínica, Coordinación de Investigación en Salud, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Ciudad de México, México.
• Gac Med Mex. 2024 Apr 8; 160 (2): 179186179-186.

BackgroundNon-therapeutic hysterectomy in girls and adolescents with intellectual disability (ID) is an acceptable practice, even when there is a lack of prescriptive ethical reason.ObjectivesTo determine the magnitude of the practice of hysterectomy in girls and adolescents with ID, and explore the emic factors associated with this procedure.Material And MethodsMulticenter, intersectoral study with a mixed methods design.ResultsThe quantitative results showed that 50 of 234 reported hysterectomies corresponded to females with ID. Average age at the time of surgery was 15 ± 2.9 years. Prophylactic abdominal hysterectomy was the most common procedure, and the justifications for it were "fertility control", "menstrual hygiene management", and "risk of sexual abuse". A qualitative analysis of 15 focus groups revealed that parents' main concern was how to manage their daughters' index disease and reproductive health; they perceived menstruation positively; they expressed their fear of dying and leaving them without support, and emphasized fertility control; none of them approved hysterectomy.ConclusionsThe bodies that define health policies need to create a new philosophy that avoids the reductionist approach of current biomedical model, which separates (in the health-disease process) our interdependence with other humans.

12 keywords...

hide…