• Niels Kant, Sjoerd H Garssen, Carlijn A Vernooij, Gert-Jan Mauritz, Mark V Koning, Frank H Bosch, and DoggenCarine J MCJM0000-0003-4766-4333Clinical Research Center, Rijnstate Hospital, Wagnerlaan 55, 6815 AD, Arnhem, The Netherlands. c.j.m.doggen@utwente.nl.Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Faculty of Behavioral, Management and Socia.
• Clinical Research Center, Rijnstate Hospital, Wagnerlaan 55, 6815 AD, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
• Intern Emerg Med. 2024 Jun 1; 19 (4): 105110611051-1061.

AbstractIn Acute Admission Wards, vital signs are commonly measured only intermittently. This may result in failure to detect early signs of patient deterioration and impede timely identification of patient stability, ultimately leading to prolonged stays and avoidable hospital admissions. Therefore, continuous vital sign monitoring may improve hospital efficacy. The objective of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the effect of continuous monitoring on the proportion of patients safely discharged home directly from an Acute Admission Ward. Patients were randomized to either the control group, which received usual care, or the sensor group, which additionally received continuous monitoring using a wearable sensor. The continuous measurements could be considered in discharge decision-making by physicians during the daily bedside rounds. Safe discharge was defined as no unplanned readmissions, emergency department revisits or deaths, within 30 days after discharge. Additionally, length of stay, the number of Intensive Care Unit admissions and Rapid Response Team calls were assessed. In total, 400 patients were randomized, of which 394 completed follow-up, with 196 assigned to the sensor group and 198 to the control group. The proportion of patients safely discharged home was 33.2% in the sensor group and 30.8% in the control group (p = 0.62). No significant differences were observed in secondary outcomes. The trial was terminated prematurely due to futility. In conclusion, continuous monitoring did not have an effect on the proportion of patients safely discharged from an Acute Admission Ward. Implementation challenges of continuous monitoring may have contributed to the lack of effect observed. Trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05181111 . Registered: January 6, 2022.© 2024. The Author(s).

22 keywords...

hide…