• Richard M Martin, Emma L Turner, Grace J Young, Chris Metcalfe, Eleanor I Walsh, J Athene Lane, SterneJonathan A CJACDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Fo, Sian Noble, Peter Holding, Yoav Ben-Shlomo, Naomi J Williams, Nora Pashayan, Mai Ngoc Bui, Peter C Albertsen, Tyler M Seibert, Anthony L Zietman, Jon Oxley, Jan Adolfsson, Malcolm D Mason, Davey SmithGeorgeGDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom., David E Neal, Freddie C Hamdy, Jenny L Donovan, and CAP Trial Group.
• Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
• JAMA. 2024 May 7; 331 (17): 146014701460-1470.

ImportanceThe Cluster Randomized Trial of PSA Testing for Prostate Cancer (CAP) reported no effect of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening on prostate cancer mortality at a median 10-year follow-up (primary outcome), but the long-term effects of PSA screening on prostate cancer mortality remain unclear.ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of a single invitation for PSA screening on prostate cancer-specific mortality at a median 15-year follow-up compared with no invitation for screening.Design, Setting, And ParticipantsThis secondary analysis of the CAP randomized clinical trial included men aged 50 to 69 years identified at 573 primary care practices in England and Wales. Primary care practices were randomized between September 25, 2001, and August 24, 2007, and men were enrolled between January 8, 2002, and January 20, 2009. Follow-up was completed on March 31, 2021.InterventionMen received a single invitation for a PSA screening test with subsequent diagnostic tests if the PSA level was 3.0 ng/mL or higher. The control group received standard practice (no invitation).Main Outcomes And MeasuresThe primary outcome was reported previously. Of 8 prespecified secondary outcomes, results of 4 were reported previously. The 4 remaining prespecified secondary outcomes at 15-year follow-up were prostate cancer-specific mortality, all-cause mortality, and prostate cancer stage and Gleason grade at diagnosis.ResultsOf 415 357 eligible men (mean [SD] age, 59.0 [5.6] years), 98% were included in these analyses. Overall, 12 013 and 12 958 men with a prostate cancer diagnosis were in the intervention and control groups, respectively (15-year cumulative risk, 7.08% [95% CI, 6.95%-7.21%] and 6.94% [95% CI, 6.82%-7.06%], respectively). At a median 15-year follow-up, 1199 men in the intervention group (0.69% [95% CI, 0.65%-0.73%]) and 1451 men in the control group (0.78% [95% CI, 0.73%-0.82%]) died of prostate cancer (rate ratio [RR], 0.92 [95% CI, 0.85-0.99]; P = .03). Compared with the control, the PSA screening intervention increased detection of low-grade (Gleason score [GS] ≤6: 2.2% vs 1.6%; P < .001) and localized (T1/T2: 3.6% vs 3.1%; P < .001) disease but not intermediate (GS of 7), high-grade (GS ≥8), locally advanced (T3), or distally advanced (T4/N1/M1) tumors. There were 45 084 all-cause deaths in the intervention group (23.2% [95% CI, 23.0%-23.4%]) and 50 336 deaths in the control group (23.3% [95% CI, 23.1%-23.5%]) (RR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.94-1.01]; P = .11). Eight of the prostate cancer deaths in the intervention group (0.7%) and 7 deaths in the control group (0.5%) were related to a diagnostic biopsy or prostate cancer treatment.Conclusions And RelevanceIn this secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial, a single invitation for PSA screening compared with standard practice without routine screening reduced prostate cancer deaths at a median follow-up of 15 years. However, the absolute reduction in deaths was small.Trial Registrationisrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN92187251.

35 keywords...

hide…