• Katrin Fink, Meike Schwarz, Linda Feldbrügge, Julia N Sunkomat, Tilmann Schwab, Natascha Bourgeois, Manfred Olschewski, Constantin von Zur Mühlen, Christoph Bode, and Hans-Jörg Busch.
• Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Hospital of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str 55, 79106 Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany. katrin.fink@uniklinik-freiburg.de
• Crit Care. 2010 Jan 1; 14 (3): R104R104.

IntroductionIschemia and reperfusion after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) induce endothelial activation and systemic inflammatory response, resulting in post-resuscitation disease. In this study we analyzed direct markers of endothelial injury, circulating endothelial cells (CECs) and endothelial microparticles (EMPs), and endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) as a marker of endothelial repair in patients after CPR.MethodsFirst we investigated endothelial injury in 40 patients after CPR, 30 controls with stable coronary artery disease (CAD), and 9 healthy subjects, who were included to measure CECs and EMPs. In a subsequent study, endothelial repair was assessed by EPC measurement in 15 CPR, 9 CAD, and 5 healthy subjects. Blood samples were drawn immediately and 24 hours after ROSC and analyzed by flow cytometry. For all statistical analyses P < 0.05 was considered significant.ResultsThere was a massive rise in CEC count in resuscitated patients compared to CAD (4,494.1 +/- 1,246 versus 312.7 +/- 41 cells/mL; P < 0.001) and healthy patients (47.5 +/- 3.7 cells/mL; P < 0.0005). Patients after prolonged CPR (>or=30 min) showed elevated CECs compared to those resuscitated for <30 min (6,216.6 +/- 2,057 versus 2,340.9 +/- 703.5 cells/mL; P = 0.13/ns). There was a significant positive correlation of CEC count with duration of CPR (R2= 0.84; P < 0.01). EMPs were higher immediately after CPR compared to controls (31.2 +/- 5.8 versus 19.7 +/- 2.4 events/microL; P = 0.12 (CAD); versus 15.0 +/- 5.2 events/microL; P = 0.07 (healthy)) but did not reach significance until 24 hours after CPR (69.1 +/- 12.4 versus 22.0 +/- 3.0 events/microL; P < 0.005 (CAD); versus 15.4 +/- 4.4 events/microL; P < 0.001 (healthy)). EPCs were significantly elevated in patients on the second day after CPR compared to CAD (1.16 +/- 0.41 versus 0.02 +/- 0.01% of lymphocytes; P < 0.005) and healthy (0.04 +/- 0.01; P < 0.005).ConclusionsIn the present study we provide evidence for a severe endothelial damage after successful CPR. Our results point to an ongoing process of endothelial injury, paralleled by a subsequent endothelial regeneration 24 hours after resuscitation.

25 keywords...

hide…