• Pediatrics · May 2013

    Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study

    A cough algorithm for chronic cough in children: a multicenter, randomized controlled study.

    • Anne Bernadette Chang, Colin Francis Robertson, Peter Paul van Asperen, Nicholas John Glasgow, Ian Brent Masters, Laurel Teoh, Craig Michael Mellis, Louis Isaac Landau, Julie Maree Marchant, and Peter Stanley Morris.
    • Child Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Australia. annechang@ausdoctors.net
    • Pediatrics. 2013 May 1;131(5):e1576-83.

    ObjectivesThe goals of this study were to: (1) determine if management according to a standardized clinical management pathway/algorithm (compared with usual treatment) improves clinical outcomes by 6 weeks; and (2) assess the reliability and validity of a standardized clinical management pathway for chronic cough in children.MethodsA total of 272 children (mean ± SD age: 4.5 ± 3.7 years) were enrolled in a pragmatic, multicenter, randomized controlled trial in 5 Australian centers. Children were randomly allocated to 1 of 2 arms: (1) early review and use of cough algorithm ("early-arm"); or (2) usual care until review and use of cough algorithm ("delayed-arm"). The primary outcomes were proportion of children whose cough resolved and cough-specific quality of life scores at week 6. Secondary measures included cough duration postrandomization and the algorithm's reliability, validity, and feasibility.ResultsCough resolution (at week 6) was significantly more likely in the early-arm group compared with the delayed-arm group (absolute risk reduction: 24.7% [95% confidence interval: 13-35]). The difference between cough-specific quality of life scores at week 6 compared with baseline was significantly better in the early-arm group (mean difference between groups: 0.6 [95% confidence interval: 0.29-1.0]). Duration of cough postrandomization was significantly shorter in the early-arm group than in the delayed-arm group (P = .001). The cough algorithm was reliable (κ = 1 in key steps). Feasibility was demonstrated by the algorithm's validity (93%-100%) and efficacy (99.6%). Eighty-five percent of children had etiologies easily diagnosed in primary care.ConclusionsManagement of children with chronic cough, in accordance with a standardized algorithm, improves clinical outcomes irrespective of when it is implemented. Further testing of this standardized clinical algorithm in different settings is recommended.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…