• Ruth Hailu, Jessica Sousa, Mitchell Tang, Ateev Mehrotra, and Lori Uscher-Pines.
• Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
• J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Oct 1; 39 (13): 247124772471-2477.

BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic resulted in greater use of remote patient monitoring (RPM). However, the use of RPM has been modest compared to other forms of telehealth.ObjectiveTo identify and describe barriers to the implementation of RPM among primary care physicians (PCPs) that may be constraining its growth.DesignWe conducted 20 semi-structured interviews with PCPs across the USA who adopted RPM. Interview questions focused on implementation facilitators and barriers and RPM's impact on quality. We conducted thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews using both inductive and deductive approaches. The analysis was informed by the NASSS (non-adoption and abandonment and challenges to scale-up, spread, and sustainability) framework.ParticipantsPCPs who practiced at least 10 h per week in an outpatient setting, served adults, and monitored blood pressure and/or blood glucose levels with automatic transmission of data with at least 3 patients.Key ResultsWhile PCPs generally agreed that RPM improved quality of care for their patients, many identified barriers to adoption and maintenance of RPM programs. Challenges included difficulties handling the influx of data and establishing a manageable workflow, along with digital and health literacy barriers. In addition to these barriers, many PCPs did not believe RPM was profitable.ConclusionsTo encourage ongoing growth of RPM, it will be necessary to address implementation barriers through changes in payment policy, training and education in digital and health literacy, improvements in staff roles and workflows, and new strategies to ensure equitable access.© 2024. The Author(s).

36 keywords...

hide…