• Kaushik Guha, Christopher J Allen, Sumir Chawla, Hayley Pryse-Hawkins, Laura Fallon, Vicki Chambers, Ali Vazir, Alex R Lyon, Martin R Cowie, and Rakesh Sharma.
• Cardiology Department, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK and National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, UK, *contributed equally k.guha@rbht.nhs.uk.
• Clin Med (Lond). 2016 Oct 1; 16 (5): 407411407-411.

AbstractThe National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) updated its guidelines for chronic heart failure (HF) in 2010. This re-audit assessed interim improvement as compared with an audit in 2011. Patients with HF (preserved and reduced ejection fraction) attending a tertiary cardiac centre over a 2-year period (January 2013-December 2014) were audited. The data collected included demographics, HF aetiology, medications, clinical parameters and cardiac rehabilitation. In total, 513 patients were audited. Compared with 2011, male preponderance (71%) and age (68±14 years, (Mean ± SD)) were similar. 73% of patients lived outside of London. HF aetiologies included ischaemic heart disease (37% versus 40% in 2011), dilated cardiomyopathy (26% versus 20%) primary valve disease (13% versus 12%). For patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (n=434, 85% of patients audited) 89% were taking beta-blockers (compared with 77% in 2011), 91% an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker (86% in 2011) and 56% a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (44% in 2011); 6% were prescribed ivabradine. All patients were reviewed at least 6-monthly. Although 100% of patients were educated about exercise, only 21 (4%) enrolled in a supervised exercise programme. This audit demonstrated high rates of documentation, follow-up and compliance with guideline-based medical therapies. A consistent finding was poor access to cardiac rehabilitation.© Royal College of Physicians 2016. All rights reserved.

23 keywords...

hide…