• Tomoyuki Maruo, Koichi Hosomi, Toshio Shimokawa, Haruhiko Kishima, Satoru Oshino, Shayne Morris, Yu Kageyama, Masaru Yokoe, Toshiki Yoshimine, and Youichi Saitoh.
• Department of Neurosurgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan; Department of Neuromodulation and Neurosurgery, Office for University-Industry Collaboration, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
• Brain Stimul. 2013 Nov 1;6(6):884-91.

BackgroundRepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been reported to be clinically effective for treating motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD). Few studies have been performed reporting the effects of rTMS on non-motor symptoms such as depression and apathy in PD.ObjectiveWe assessed the effects of high-frequency (HF) rTMS over the primary motor (M1) foot area on motor symptoms, depression and apathy scales, and sensory symptoms in PD.MethodsWe investigated the efficacy of 3 consecutive days of HF-rTMS over the M1 foot area in 21 patients with PD using a randomized, double-blind cross-over trial compared with sham stimulation. Motor effects were evaluated using the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III (UPDRS-III), the self-assessment motor score, the visual analog scale (VAS), the 10-m walking test, and finger tapping. Non-motor effects were analyzed using the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale, the Apathy Scale, and quantitative sensory testing.ResultsHF-rTMS significantly improved UPDRS-III (P < 0.001), VAS (P < 0.001), the walking test (P = 0.014), self-assessment motor score (P = 0.010), and finger tapping measurement (P < 0.05) compared to sham stimulation. In contrast, no significant improvement was observed in depression and apathy scales. Consecutive days of rTMS did not significantly increase the improvement in motor symptoms. There were no adverse effects following rTMS on patients with PD.ConclusionsWe confirmed that HF-rTMS over the M1 foot area significantly improved motor symptoms in patients with PD. In addition, daily repeated stimulation was not significantly more effective than a single session of stimulation, but may be effective for maintaining the improvement in motor symptoms in patients with PD.Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

25 keywords...

hide…