• Radiology · Oct 2004

    Comparative Study

    Sixteen-detector row CT of abdomen and pelvis: study for optimization of Z-axis modulation technique performed in 153 patients.

    • Mannudeep K Kalra, Michael M Maher, Ravi S Kamath, Tetsuya Horiuchi, Thomas L Toth, Elkan F Halpern, and Sanjay Saini.
    • Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging and Intervention, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, White 270-E, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114, USA. mannudeep_k_kalra@yahoo.com
    • Radiology. 2004 Oct 1;233(1):241-9.

    PurposeTo retrospectively determine the optimal noise indexes required to obtain diagnostically acceptable computed tomographic (CT) images of the abdomen and pelvis with z-axis modulation.Materials And MethodsNinety-five patients underwent 16-section multi-detector row CT of the abdomen and pelvis with z-axis modulation at noise indexes of 10.5, 11.0, 11.5, and 12.0 HU with 10-380 mA. Subsequently, 58 patients were scanned at noise indexes of 12.5 and 15.0 HU with 75-380 mA. The weights of all subjects were recorded, and transverse and anteroposterior diameters were measured. The CT images were evaluated for abnormalities and graded for image quality in terms of noise and diagnostic acceptability by using a five-point scale. Objective noise in the liver parenchyma was measured, and the tube current was recorded at each section in all 153 patients. Statistical analyses were performed to determine the appropriate noise index and to assess the effect of patient weight and abdominal diameters on image noise and diagnostic acceptability at different noise indexes. Tube current-time products (in milliampere seconds) at various noise indexes were compared with those at CT previously performed without z-axis modulation.ResultsNo significant difference in subjective image noise or diagnostic acceptability was found at noise indexes of 10.5-15.0 HU (P =.14), and objective noise was significantly inferior only at a noise index of 15.0 HU (P =.009). Compared with CT scanning at a 10.5-HU noise index, CT scanning at 12.5- and 15.0-HU noise indexes yielded, respectively, 10.0% and 41.3% reductions in radiation exposure. Patient weight and abdominal diameters affected subjective image quality.ConclusionUse of a 15.0-HU noise index at 75-380 mA results in acceptable subjective image noise and diagnostic acceptability but significantly greater objective image noise at routine abdominal-pelvic CT. For greater image quality demands, a noise index of 12.5 HU results in acceptable image quality and a 19.6% reduction in radiation exposure.Copyright RSNA, 2004

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…