• Aurélie Lefebvre, Christine Lorut, Marco Alifano, Hervé Dermine, Nicolas Roche, Rémy Gauzit, Jean-François Regnard, Gérard Huchon, and Antoine Rabbat.
• Department of Respiratory and Intensive Care Medicine, Hôtel-Dieu Hospital, AP-HP, Université Paris 5, René Descartes, Paris, France.
• Intensive Care Med. 2009 Apr 1;35(4):663-70.

BackgroundA single prospective randomized study found that, in selected patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) following lung resection, noninvasive ventilation (NIV) decreases the need for endotracheal mechanical ventilation and improves clinical outcome.MethodWe prospectively evaluated early NIV use for ARF after lung resection during a 4-year period in the setting of a medical and a surgical ICU of a university hospital. We documented demographics, initial clinical characteristics and clinical outcomes. NIV failure was defined as the need for tracheal intubation.ResultsAmong 690 patients at risk of severe complications following lung resection, 113 (16.3%) experienced ARF, which was initially supported by NIV in 89 (78.7%), including 59 with hypoxemic ARF (66.3%) and 30 with hypercapnic ARF (33.7%). The overall success rate of NIV was 85.3% (76/89). In-ICU mortality was 6.7% (6/89). The mortality rate following NIV failure was 46.1%. Predictive factors of NIV failure in univariate analysis were age (P = 0.046), previous cardiac comorbidities (P = 0.0075), postoperative pneumonia (P = 0.0016), admission in the surgical ICU (P = 0.034), no initial response to NIV (P < 0.0001) and occurrence of noninfectious complications (P = 0.037). Only two independent factors were significantly associated with NIV failure in multivariate analysis: cardiac comorbidities (odds ratio, 11.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.9-68.3; P = 0.007) and no initial response to NIV (odds ratio, 117.6; 95% confidence interval, 10.6-1305.8; P = 0.0001).ConclusionThis prospective survey confirms the feasibility and efficacy of NIV in ARF following lung resection.

22 keywords...

hide…