• Matthew R Garner, Brittany Homcha, Trevin Cowman, Madison Goss, J Spence Reid, and Gregory S Lewis.
• Department of Orthopaedics & Rehabilitation, Penn State College of Medicine, 500 University Dr. Hershey, PA 17033 USA. Electronic address: garnerm2@upmc.edu.
• Injury. 2024 Jun 1; 55 (6): 111574111574.

IntroductionMultiplanar mesh plating of patella fractures has become more popular in recent years. It was the goal of this study to compare the biomechanical stability of cannulated screw with anterior tension band to multiplanar mesh plating for fixation of transverse patella fractures in cadaver specimens.Materials And MethodsEight matched pairs of fresh frozen cadaveric knees were obtained and soft tissues dissected leaving the extensor mechanism, joint capsule, and retinaculum intact. Transverse fractures were created at the mid-portion of the patella. For each pair, one specimen was repaired using cannulated screws with anterior tension band, and the second was repaired using multiplanar mesh plating. Each specimen underwent cyclic extension loading with loads increasing by 1.1 kg after every 50 cycles. Interfragmentary displacement was measured at the end of each interval at both 5° and 45° of knee flexion angle, with fixation failure defined by >2 mm displacement.ResultsThe specimens fixed with multiplanar mesh plating survived more cycles and higher loads than the specimens fixed with cannulated screws with anterior tension band (p = 0.011 comparing survival plots). After 150 cycles of extension loading, 3 of 8 of the specimens fixed with screws/tension band had failed, whereas none of the mesh plated specimens had failed. After 400 cycles, 7 of 8 of the screws/tension band had failed, whereas half of the mesh plated specimens had failed.ConclusionsWhile a more technically challenging and expensive technique, mesh plating for patella fractures appears to offer greater durability than traditional cannulated screw with tension banding.Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

27 keywords...

hide…