-
J. Natl. Cancer Inst. · Oct 2006
Comparative StudyMenopausal hormone therapy and ovarian cancer risk in the National Institutes of Health-AARP Diet and Health Study Cohort.
- James V Lacey, Louise A Brinton, Michael F Leitzmann, Traci Mouw, Albert Hollenbeck, Arthur Schatzkin, and Patricia Hartge.
- Hormonal and Reproductive Epidemiology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MDUSA. jimlacey@nih.gov
- J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2006 Oct 4;98(19):1397-405.
BackgroundRecent studies offer conflicting data on risks of ovarian cancer in users of menopausal hormone therapy. Some findings of increased risks associated with unopposed estrogen use are based on older studies of women with intact uteri, and small sample size and incomplete exposure information have limited the data on estrogen plus progestin associations.MethodsThe National Institutes of Health-AARP Diet and Health Study Cohort included 97,638 women aged 50-71 years at baseline who completed two questionnaires (1995-1996 and 1996-1997). We identified 214 incident ovarian cancers among these women through the year 2000 using data from state cancer registries and mortality indexes. We estimated relative risks (RRs) of ovarian cancer for detailed hormone therapy exposures using multivariable proportional hazards regression models. All statistical tests were two-sided.ResultsUse of unopposed estrogen for fewer than 10 years was not associated with ovarian cancer. Compared with use of no hormone therapy, use of unopposed estrogen for 10 or more years was statistically significantly associated with ovarian cancer among all women (RR = 1.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.22 to 2.95; P = .004; 56 versus 72 ovarian cancers per 100,000 person-years, respectively) and, albeit not statistically significantly, among women with hysterectomy (n = 19,359, RR = 1.70, 95% CI = 0.87 to 3.31; P = .06). Among the 73,483 women with intact uteri, 51,698 had used no hormone therapy or only estrogen plus progestin. Compared with no hormone therapy use, 5 or more years of use of sequential (progestin for < 15 days per cycle; RR = 3.09, 95% CI = 1.68 to 5.68; P < .001; 49 versus 108 per 100,000 person-years) or continuous (progestin for > or = 15 days per cycle; RR = 1.82, 95% CI = 1.03 to 3.23; P = .02; 49 versus 66 per 100,000 person-years) estrogen plus progestin regimens were statistically significantly associated with ovarian cancer.ConclusionsLong durations of use of unopposed estrogen and of estrogen plus progestin, especially sequential regimens, are associated with increased ovarian cancer risk. These data expand the range of possible risks associated with menopausal hormone therapy.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.