• Kirsten A Riggan, Nicholas V Nguyen, Jackson S Ennis, Debra A DeBruin, Richard R Sharp, Jon C Tilburt, Susan M Wolf, and Erin S DeMartino.
• Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
• Chest. 2024 Sep 1; 166 (3): 561571561-571.

BackgroundIn response to COVID-19, many states revised, developed, or attempted to develop plans to allocate scarce critical care resources in the event that crisis standards of care were triggered. To our knowledge, no prior analysis has assessed this plan development process, including whether plans were successfully adopted.Research QuestionHow did states develop or revise scarce resource allocation plans during the COVID-19 pandemic, and what were the barriers and facilitators to their development and adoption at the state level?Study Design And MethodsPlan authors and state leaders completed a semistructured interview February to September 2022. Interview transcripts were qualitatively analyzed for themes related to plan development and adoption according to the principles of grounded theory.ResultsThirty-six participants from 34 states completed an interview, from states distributed across all US regions. Among participants' states with plans that existed prior to 2020 (n = 24), 17 were revised and adopted in response to COVID-19. Six states wrote a plan de novo, with the remaining states failing to develop or adopt a plan. Thirteen states continued to revise their plans in response to disability or aging bias complaints or to respond to evolving needs. Many participants expressed that urgency in the early days of the pandemic prevented an ideal development process. Facilitators of successful plan development and adoption include: coordination or support from the state department of health and existing relationships with key community partners, including aging and disability rights groups and minoritized communities. Barriers include: lack of perceived political will to adopt a plan and development during a public health emergency.InterpretationTo avoid repeating mistakes from the early days of the COVID-19 response, states should develop or revise plans with community engagement and consider maintaining a standing committee with diverse membership and content expertise to periodically review plans and advise state officials on pandemic preparedness.Copyright © 2024 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

16 keywords...

hide…