• Eric A Pierce, Tomas S Aleman, Kanishka T Jayasundera, Bright S Ashimatey, Keunpyo Kim, Alia Rashid, Michael C Jaskolka, Rene L Myers, Byron L Lam, Steven T Bailey, Jason I Comander, Andreas K Lauer, Albert M Maguire, and Mark E Pennesi.
• From the Ocular Genomics Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Mass Eye and Ear and Harvard Medical School, Boston (E.A.P., J.I.C.), and Editas Medicine, Cambridge (B.S.A., K.K., A.R., M.C.J., R.L.M.) - both in Massachusetts; the Scheie Eye Institute and the Division of Ophthalmology of the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Department of Ophthalmology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (T.S.A., A.M.M.); the University of Michigan Kellogg Eye Center, Ann Arbor (K.T.J.); the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami, Miami (B.L.L.); and the Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland (S.T.B., A.K.L., M.E.P.).
• N. Engl. J. Med. 2024 Jun 6; 390 (21): 197219841972-1984.

BackgroundCEP290-associated inherited retinal degeneration causes severe early-onset vision loss due to pathogenic variants in CEP290. EDIT-101 is a clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9) gene-editing complex designed to treat inherited retinal degeneration caused by a specific damaging variant in intron 26 of CEP290 (IVS26 variant).MethodsWe performed a phase 1-2, open-label, single-ascending-dose study in which persons 3 years of age or older with CEP290-associated inherited retinal degeneration caused by a homozygous or compound heterozygous IVS26 variant received a subretinal injection of EDIT-101 in the worse (study) eye. The primary outcome was safety, which included adverse events and dose-limiting toxic effects. Key secondary efficacy outcomes were the change from baseline in the best corrected visual acuity, the retinal sensitivity detected with the use of full-field stimulus testing (FST), the score on the Ora-Visual Navigation Challenge mobility test, and the vision-related quality-of-life score on the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (in adults) or the Children's Visual Function Questionnaire (in children).ResultsEDIT-101 was injected in 12 adults 17 to 63 years of age (median, 37 years) at a low dose (in 2 participants), an intermediate dose (in 5), or a high dose (in 5) and in 2 children 9 and 14 years of age at the intermediate dose. At baseline, the median best corrected visual acuity in the study eye was 2.4 log10 of the minimum angle of resolution (range, 3.9 to 0.6). No serious adverse events related to the treatment or procedure and no dose-limiting toxic effects were recorded. Six participants had a meaningful improvement from baseline in cone-mediated vision as assessed with the use of FST, of whom 5 had improvement in at least one other key secondary outcome. Nine participants (64%) had a meaningful improvement from baseline in the best corrected visual acuity, the sensitivity to red light as measured with FST, or the score on the mobility test. Six participants had a meaningful improvement from baseline in the vision-related quality-of-life score.ConclusionsThe safety profile and improvements in photoreceptor function after EDIT-101 treatment in this small phase 1-2 study support further research of in vivo CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing to treat inherited retinal degenerations due to the IVS26 variant of CEP290 and other genetic causes. (Funded by Editas Medicine and others; BRILLIANCE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03872479.).Copyright © 2024 Massachusetts Medical Society.

41 keywords...

hide…