• Sami M Pathak, Joseph P Licata, Erin K M Graves, Jonathan A Gerstenhaber, and Kadir Erkmen.
• 1Department of Neurosurgery, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia; and.
• J. Neurosurg. 2024 Oct 1; 141 (4): 107910871079-1087.

ObjectiveThe most common method for external ventricular drain (EVD) placement is the freehand approach, which has reported inaccuracy rates of 12.3%-44.9%, especially in the case of altered ventricular anatomy. Current assistive devices require added time or equipment or do not account for shifted ventricles. To improve the accuracy of emergent EVD placement in the setting of altered ventricular anatomy, the authors designed a patient-specific EVD (PS-EVD) guide.MethodsThe PS-EVD guide has a tripod base and a series of differently angled inserts that lock in place at multiple rotational positions, allowing for numerous insertion angles. For testing, the authors designed a 3D-printed phantom skull with a gelatin brain analog containing ventricles simulating normal and altered ventricular anatomy. Low-resolution CT scans of the phantom were used to calculate the insertion angle in relation to the standard perpendicular entry. The corresponding insert at the correct rotational position within the base unit was positioned over the entry point on the phantom, and the catheter was inserted. Accuracy was evaluated with repeat CT scans.ResultsWith normal ventricular anatomy, as well as abnormally shifted ventricles, proper use of the PS-EVD guide led to accurate catheter insertion into the ventricle in trials, as confirmed on coronal and sagittal CT images, including cases in which a perpendicular trajectory, such as with the Ghajar guide, was insufficient.ConclusionsThe PS-EVD guide allows consistent and accurate EVD placement in phantom skulls with both normal and altered ventricular anatomy. Further trials comparing this device to the freehand approach are required.

27 keywords...

hide…