• Am. J. Surg. · Dec 2010

    Evaluation of empiric antibiotic use in surgical sepsis.

    • Kalliopi Fitousis, Laura Jane Moore, Jeffery Hall, Frederick A Moore, and Steven Pass.
    • The Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
    • Am. J. Surg. 2010 Dec 1;200(6):776-82; discussion 782.

    BackgroundWe performed an evaluation of antimicrobial guidelines for patients with surgical sepsis.MethodsThe purpose of this study was to validate current empiric antibiotic recommendations in our sepsis protocol based on the suspected site of infection. The primary objective was to assess the appropriateness of empiric antibiotic recommendations and to determine if initial empiric antibiotics provided adequate coverage compared with sensitivity data (accuracy). Secondary end points included antibiotic protocol compliance, intensive care unit (ICU)-free days, and mortality.ResultsAppropriate antibiotics were prescribed in 82% of patients. Of the culture-positive patients, 72% received accurate antibiotics. ICU-free days were greater for patients in the compliant group (14.5 vs 8.4; P = .014). Hospital mortality was greater in patients who were noncompliant with protocol recommendations (22% vs 17%; P = .44).ConclusionsOur current antibiotic guidelines provide appropriate and accurate antimicrobial coverage. Noncompliance with the antibiotic protocol resulted in fewer ICU-free days and increased hospital mortality in surgical sepsis patients.Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…