• Guofeng Zhang, Huanfei Ding, Di Wang, Fei Guo, and Bowen Hu.
• Department of Pediatric Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
• Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 May 3; 103 (18): e37810e37810.

AbstractThe objective of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic-assisted surgery and traditional open surgery for pediatric incarcerated inguinal hernia. A total of 58 pediatric patients with indirect incarcerated inguinal hernia between January 2014 and January 2020 were included in this study. The patients were divided into 2 groups; observational group who underwent laparoscopic-assisted surgery (n = 36), and a control group who underwent traditional open surgery (n = 22). The overall operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative recovery time, length of hospital stay, occurrence of postoperative scrotal or vulvar hematomas, incidence of postoperative surgical site infection, and hernia recurrence were analyzed and compared between the 2 groups. Compared with the control group, the operation time (38.28 ± 5.90) minutes, intraoperative blood loss (1.15 ± 0.54 mL), postoperative recovery time (8.39 ± 1.42 h), and length of hospital stay (1.64 ± 0.59) were significantly lower in the observational group (P < .05). There was no incidence of scrotal or vulvar hematoma or surgical site infection in the observation group, which was significantly lower than that in the control group (P < .05). However, no statistically significant difference was found in the rate of postoperative hernia recurrence between the 2 groups (P > .05). In conclusion, laparoscopic-assisted surgery appears to be a safe and effective alternative approach to traditional open surgery for the treatment of pediatric incarcerated inguinal hernia. Its advantages include reduced trauma, faster recovery, shorter hospital stays, and fewer complications.Copyright © 2024 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

23 keywords...

hide…