• J Gen Intern Med · Jun 1999

    Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical Trial

    Validation of the pneumonia severity index. Importance of study-specific recalibration.

    • W D Flanders, G Tucker, A Krishnadasan, D Martin, E Honig, and W M McClellan.
    • Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health of Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
    • J Gen Intern Med. 1999 Jun 1; 14 (6): 333340333-40.

    ObjectiveTo evaluate the predictive validity and calibration of the pneumonia severity-of-illness index (PSI) in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).PatientsRandomly selected patients (n = 1,024) admitted with CAP to 22 community hospitals.Measurements And Main ResultsMedical records were abstracted to obtain prognostic information used in the PSI. The discriminatory ability of the PSI to identify patients who died and the calibration of the PSI across deciles of risk were determined. The PSI discriminates well between patients with high risk of death and those with a lower risk. In contrast, calibration of the PSI was poor, and the PSI predicted about 2.4 times more deaths than actually occurred in our population of patients with CAP.ConclusionsWe found that the PSI had good discriminatory ability. The original PSI overestimated absolute risk of death in our population. We describe a simple approach to recalibration, which corrected the overestimation in our population. Recalibration may be needed when transporting this prediction rule across populations.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.