• Angelique M E de Man, Jan Gunst, and Reintam BlaserAnnikaA0000-0003-1211-7372Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Lucerne Cantonal Hospital, Spitalstrasse, 6000, Lucerne, Switzerland..
• Department of Intensive Care, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. ame.deman@amsterdamumc.nl.
• Intensive Care Med. 2024 Jul 1; 50 (7): 103510481035-1048.

AbstractRecent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown no benefit but  dose-dependent harm by early full nutritional support in critically ill patients. Lack of benefit may be explained by anabolic resistance, suppression of cellular repair processes, and aggravation of hyperglycemia and insulin needs. Also early high amino acid doses did not provide benefit, but instead associated with harm in patients with organ dysfunctions. However, most studies focused on nutritional interventions initiated during the first days after intensive care unit admission. Although the intervention window of some RCTs extended into the post-acute phase of critical illness, no large RCTs studied nutritional interventions initiated beyond the first week. Hence, clear evidence-based guidance on when and how to initiate and advance nutrition is lacking. Prolonged underfeeding will come at a price as there is no validated metabolic monitor that indicates readiness for medical nutrition therapy, and an adequate response to nutrition, which likely varies between patients. Also micronutrient status cannot be assessed reliably, as inflammation can cause redistribution, so that plasma micronutrient concentrations are not necessarily reflective of total body stores. Moreover, high doses of individual micronutrients have not proven beneficial. Accordingly, current evidence provides clear guidance on which nutritional strategies to avoid, but the ideal nutritional regimen for individual patients remains unclear. In this narrative review, we summarize the findings of recent studies, discuss possible mechanisms explaining the results, point out pitfalls in interpretation of RCTs and their effect on clinical practice, and formulate suggestions for future research.© 2024. The Author(s).

20 keywords...

hide…