• Timothy C Flynn, Murray F Brennan, E Christopher Ellison, Julie A Freischlag, Mark A Malangoni, Carlos A Pellegrini, Ajit K Sachdeva, Patricia L Turner, Andrew L Warshaw, and Michael J Zinner.
• Department of Surgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL.
• Ann. Surg. 2024 May 24.

ObjectiveReview the subsequent impact of recommendations made by the 2004 American Surgical Association Blue Ribbon Committee (BRC I) Report on Surgical Education.BackgroundCurrent leaders of the American College of Surgeons and the American Surgical Association convened an expert panel to review the impact of the BRC I report and make recommendations for future improvements in surgical education.MethodsBRC I members reviewed the 2004 recommendations in light of the current status of surgical education.ResultsSome of the recommendations of BRC I have gained traction and have been implemented. There is a well-organized national curriculum and numerous educational offerings. There has been greater emphasis on preparing faculty to teach and there are ample opportunities for professional advancement as an educator. The number of residents has grown, although not at a pace to meet the country's needs either by total number or geographic distribution. The number of women in the profession has increased. There is greater awareness and attention to resident (and faculty) well-being. The anticipated radical change in the educational scheme has not been adopted. Training in surgical research still depends on the resources and interests of individual programs. Financing student and graduate medical education remains a challenge.ConclusionsThe medical landscape has changed considerably since BRC I published its findings in 2005. A contemporary assessment of surgical education and training is needed to meet the future needs of the profession and our patients.Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

5 keywords...

hide…