• Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. · Nov 2024

    Discovery and Validation of a Volatile Signature of Eosinophilic Airway Inflammation in Asthma.

    • Rosa Peltrini, Rebecca L Cordell, Michael Wilde, Shahd Abuhelal, Eleanor Quek, Nazanin Zounemat-Kermani, Wadah Ibrahim, Matthew Richardson, Paul Brinkman, Florence Schleich, Pierre-Hugues Stefanuto, Hnin Aung, Neil Greening, Sven Erik Dahlen, Ratko Djukanovic, Ian M Adcock, Christopher Brightling, Paul Monks, and Salman Siddiqui.
    • Department of Respiratory Sciences and.
    • Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2024 Nov 1; 210 (9): 110111121101-1112.

    AbstractRationale: Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in asthmatic breath may be associated with sputum eosinophilia. We developed a volatile biomarker signature to predict sputum eosinophilia in asthma. Methods: VOCs emitted into the space above sputum samples (headspace) from patients with severe asthma (n = 36) were collected onto sorbent tubes and analyzed using thermal desorption gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Elastic net regression identified stable VOCs associated with sputum eosinophilia ⩾ 3% and generated a volatile biomarker signature. This VOC signature was validated in breath samples from: 1) patients with acute asthma according to blood eosinophilia ⩾0.3 × 109cells/L or sputum eosinophilia of ⩾3% in the UK EMBER (East Midlands Breathomics Pathology Node) consortium (n = 65) and 2) U-BIOPRED-IMI (Unbiased Biomarkers in Prediction of Respiratory Disease Outcomes Innovative Medicines Initiative) consortium (n = 42). Breath samples were collected onto sorbent tubes (EMBER) or Tedlar bags (U-BIOPRED) and analyzed by GC-MS (GC × GC-MS for EMBER or GC-MS for U-BIOPRED). Measurements and Main Results: The in vitro headspace identified 19 VOCs associated with sputum eosinophilia, and the derived VOC signature yielded good diagnostic accuracy for sputum eosinophilia ⩾3% in headspace (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC] 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80-0.99; P < 0.0001), correlated inversely with sputum eosinophil percentage (rs = -0.71; P < 0.0001), and outperformed fractional exhaled nitric oxide (AUROC 0.61; 95% CI, 0.35-0.86). Analysis of exhaled breath in replication cohorts yielded a VOC signature AUROC (95% CI) for acute asthma exacerbations of 0.89 (0.76-1.0) (EMBER cohort) with sputum eosinophilia and 0.90 (0.75-1.0) in U-BIOPRED, again outperforming fractional exhaled nitric oxide in U-BIOPRED (0.62 [0.33-0.90]). Conclusions: We have discovered and provided early-stage clinical validation of a volatile biomarker signature associated with eosinophilic airway inflammation. Further work is needed to translate our discovery using point-of-care clinical sensors.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…