• David Dorian, Ross J Thomson, Hoong Sern Lim, and Alastair G Proudfoot.
• Barts Heart Centre, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
• Curr Opin Crit Care. 2024 Aug 1; 30 (4): 324332324-332.

Purpose Of ReviewWe review the current Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) cardiogenic shock classification system and consider alternatives or iterations that may enhance our current descriptions of cardiogenic shock trajectory.Recent FindingsSeveral studies have identified the potential prognostic value of serial SCAI stage re-assessment, usually within the first 24 h of shock onset, to predict deterioration and clinical outcomes across shock causes. In parallel, numerous registry-based analyses support the utility of a more precise assessment of the macrocirculation and microcirculation, leveraging invasive haemodynamics, imaging and additional laboratory and clinical markers. The emergence of machine learning and artificial intelligence capabilities offers the opportunity to integrate multimodal data into high fidelity, real-time metrics to more precisely define trajectory and inform our therapeutic decision making.SummaryWhilst the SCAI staging system remains a pivotal tool in cardiogenic shock assessment, communication and reassessment, it is vital that the sophistication with which we measure and assess shock trajectory evolves in parallel our understanding of the complexity and variability of clinical course and clinical outcomes.Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

19 keywords...

hide…