• J Clin Monit Comput · Oct 2024

    Differential Cardiac Responses after Passive Leg Raising.

    • Ricardo Castro, Eduardo Kattan, Glenn Hernández, and Jan Bakker.
    • Departamento de Medicina Intensiva, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Av. Diagonal Paraguay #362 piso 6 Santiago Centro, Santiago, 8330049, RM, Chile. rcastrol@uc.cl.
    • J Clin Monit Comput. 2024 Oct 1; 38 (5): 991996991-996.

    AbstractThis study retrospectively examined the hemodynamic effects of passive leg raising (PLR) in mechanically ventilated patients during fluid removal before spontaneous breathing trials. In previous studies, we noticed varying cardiac responses after PLR completion, particularly in positive tests. Using a bioreactance monitor, we recorded and analyzed hemodynamic parameters, including stroke volume and cardiac index (CI), before and after PLR in post-acute ICU patients. We included 27 patients who underwent 60 PLR procedures. In preload-unresponsive patients, no significant CI changes were observed (CI_t-6 = 3.7 [2.6; 4.7] mL/min/m2 vs. CI_t9 = 3.3 [2.5; 3.4] mL/min/m2; p = 0.306), while in preload-responsive patients, two distinct CI response types to PLR were identified: a transient peak with immediate return to baseline (CI_t-6 = 2.7 [2.5; 3.1] mL/min/m2 vs. 3.3 [2.6; 3.8] L/min/m2; p = 0.119) and a sustained CI elevation lasting beyond the PLR maneuver (CI_t-6 = 2.8 [2.3; 2.9] L/min/m2 vs. 3.3 [2.8; 3.9] ml/min/m2; p = 0.034). The latter was particularly noted when ΔCI during PLR exceeded 25%. Our findings suggest that in certain preload-responsive patients, PLR can induce a more sustained increase in CI, indicating a possible persistent hemodynamic effect. This effect could be due to a combination of autotransfusion and sympathetic activation affecting venous return and vascular tone. Further research in larger cohorts and more comprehensive hemodynamic assessments are warranted to validate these observations and elucidate the possible underlying mechanisms.The Fluid unLoading On Weaning (FLOW) study was prospectively registered under the ID NCT04496583 on 2020-07-29 at ClinicalTrials.gov.© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.