• Natalie C Ernecoff, Elizabeth Chen Kurtz, Elise Mandel Pearson, Tinsley H Grimes, Annette Aldous, Dale E Lupu, and Jane O Schell.
• RAND (N.C.E.), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA. Electronic address: nernecof@rand.org.
• J Pain Symptom Manage. 2024 Sep 1; 68 (3): e167e173e167-e173.

ContextDespite recommendations for shared decision-making and advanced care planning (ACP) for people with chronic kidney disease (CKD), such conversations are infrequent. The MY WAY educational and patient coaching intervention aimed to promote high-quality ACP.ObjectivesThis qualitative substudy sought to gain participant feedback on the MY WAY ACP coaching intervention, and how it impacted their wishes, perceptions of kidney care, and factors that helped them reflect on ACP.MethodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews with participants from the intervention arm of the MY WAY study about their prior experience with ACPs in the context of CKD, impressions of the MY WAY intervention, and outcomes of the MY WAY intervention. We conducted a qualitative thematic analysis of transcribed interviews.ResultsAmong 15 intervention participants, the following major themes emerged: 1) Patients with CKD approach ACP with varied experiences; 2) Patients felt the MY WAY coaching intervention supported ACP by reinforcing values; and 3) Patients found the coaching intervention focused on end of life, but not necessarily on decision making regarding CKD.ConclusionParticipants perceived the coaching intervention to have high utility in facilitating ACP, but had a limited impact on CKD-specific decision-making. These findings suggest that the coach plays a crucial role in comfort with ACP conversations and that ACP readiness and engagement may not correlate with treatment preferences or understanding of CKD treatment decisions.Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

21 keywords...

hide…