• E Coeckelberghs, K Vanhaecht, A Akiki, P Castillón, B Cox, AttalR ElREKlinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Sporttraumatologie, Landeskrankenhaus Feldkirch, Feldkirch, Austria., N B Foss, F Frihagen, T G Gerich, N K Kanakaris, M T Kristensen, M Mohaddes, M Panella, H C Pape, A Sermon, D Seys, and S Nijs.
• Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, Leuven, KU, Belgium. Ellen.coeckelberghs@kuleuven.be.
• Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 May 31.

PurposeDespite the availability of clinical guidelines for hip fracture patients, adherence to these guidelines is challenging, potentially resulting in suboptimal patient care. The goal of this study was (1) to evaluate and benchmark the adherence to recently established quality indicators (QIs), and (2) to study clinical outcomes, in fragile hip fracture patients from different European countries.MethodsThis observational, cross-sectional multicenter study was performed in 10 hospitals from 9 European countries including data of 298 consecutive patients.ResultsA large variation both within and between hospitals were seen regarding adherence to the individual QIs. QIs with the lowest overall adherence rates were the administration of systemic steroids (5.4%) and tranexamic acid (20.1%). Indicators with the highest adherence rates (above 95%) were pre-operative (99.3%) and post-operative haemoglobin level assessment (100%). The overall median time to surgery was 22.6 h (range 15.7-42.5 h). The median LOS was 9.0 days (range 5.0-19.0 days). The most common complications were delirium (23.2%) and postsurgical constipation (25.2%).ConclusionThe present study shows large variation in the care for fragile patients with hip fractures indicating room for improvement. Therefore, hospitals should invest in benchmarking and knowledge-sharing. Large quality improvement initiatives with longitudinal follow up of both process and outcome indicators should be initiated.© 2024. The Author(s).

4 keywords...

hide…