• Annals of surgery · Sep 2024

    Multicenter Study

    Adding Patient-Reported Outcomes to the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: Results of the First 33,842 Patients from 65 Hospitals.

    • Jason B Liu, Andrea L Pusic, Alexa D Melucci, Brian C Brajcich, Matthew J Fordham, Jakob C Lapsley, Clifford Y Ko, and TempleLarissa K FLKFSurgical Health Outcomes and Research for Equity (SHORE) Center, Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY.Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical .
    • Patient-Reported Outcomes, Value, and Experience Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
    • Ann. Surg. 2024 Sep 1; 280 (3): 383393383-393.

    ObjectiveTo investigate the initial set of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) and their associations with 30-day surgical outcomes.BackgroundPROs provide important information that can be used to improve routine care and facilitate quality improvement. The American College of Surgeons conducted a demonstration project to capture PROs into the NSQIP to complement clinical data.MethodsFrom February 2020 to March 2023, 65 hospitals collected Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System measures assessing global health, pain interference, fatigue, and physical function from patients accrued into the NSQIP. Using multivariable mixed regression, we compared the scores of patients with and without 30-day complications and further analyzed scores exceeding 1-SD worse than national benchmarks.ResultsOverall, 33842 patients completed the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System measures with a median of 58 days (IQR: 47-72) postoperatively. Among patients without complications (n = 31210), 33.9% had PRO scores 1-SD worse than national benchmarks. Patients with complications were 1.7 times more likely to report worse PROs (95% CI: 1.6-1.8). Patients with complications had lower scores for global physical health [adjusted mean difference (AMD): 2.6, 95% CI: 2.2-3.0], lower for global mental health (AMD: 1.8, 95% CI: 1.4-2.2), higher for pain interference (AMD: 2.4, 95% CI: 2.0-2.8), higher fatigue (AMD: 2.7, 95% CI: 2.3-3.1), and lower physical function (AMD: 3.2, 95% CI: 2.8-3.5).ConclusionsPostoperative complications negatively affect multiple key dimensions of patients' health-related quality of life. PROs were well below national benchmarks for many patients, even among those without complications. Identifying solutions to improve PROs after surgery remains a tremendous quality improvement opportunity.Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.