• Anna S Messmer, Gianna Baertsch, and Luca Cioccari.
• Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland - anna.messmer@insel.ch.
• Minerva Anestesiol. 2024 May 1; 90 (5): 409416409-416.

BackgroundMedical Emergency Teams (METs) have been implemented in many hospitals worldwide and are considered an integral part of the hospital patient safety system. However, data on prevalence, staffing and activation criteria of METs are scarce. Such data are important as they may help to identify areas of quality improvement and barriers to implementation of rapid response systems (RRS). This survey aimed to analyze current characteristics, prevalence, and organization of METs in Switzerland.MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional nationwide online survey, inviting physicians' and nurses' representatives from all registered adult intensive care units (ICU) in Switzerland.ResultsOf the 74 hospitals invited to participate in the survey, 57 responded (response rate 77%). We obtained 82 individual responses (from 50 physicians and 32 nurses). Twenty-five hospitals (44%) have a MET in place. In most Swiss hospitals, METs are composed of ICU consultants (64%) and ICU nurses (40%) and are activated by phone, with a usual response time of less than 10 minutes. The most common triggers are single abnormal vital signs (80%), while multiple-parameter warning scores are less commonly used (28%). While more than half of the nurses have regular trainings for their MET members (57%), most MET physicians (63%) do not. Systematic data collection of MET calls occurs in only 43% of institutions. Finally, the most common reasons for not having a MET are staff shortage (44%) and lack of funding (19%).ConclusionsLess than 50% of Swiss hospitals with an adult ICU have a MET in place. METs in Switzerland typically include an ICU doctor and an ICU nurse and are available 24/7. Major barriers to MET introduction are staff shortage and lack of funding.

11 keywords...

hide…