• Basak Ceyda Meco, Cigdem Yildirim Guclu, Joana Berger-Estilita, and Finn M Radtke.
• Departement of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine.
• Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2024 Aug 1; 37 (4): 432438432-438.

Purpose Of ReviewThis review explores the intricacies of ethical anesthesia, exploring the necessity for precision anesthesia and its impact on patient-reported outcomes. The primary objective is to advocate for a defined aim, promoting the implementation of rules and feedback systems. The ultimate goal is to enhance precision anesthesia care, ensuring patient safety through the implementation of a teamwork and the integration of feedback mechanisms.Recent FindingsRecent strategies in the field of anesthesia have evolved from intraoperative monitorization to a wider perioperative patient-centered precision care. Nonetheless, implementing this approach encounters significant obstacles. The article explores the evidence supporting the need for a defined aim and applicable rules for precision anesthesia's effectiveness. The implementation of the safety culture is underlined. The review delves into the teamwork description with structured feedback systems.SummaryAnesthesia is a multifaceted discipline that involves various stakeholders. The primary focus is delivering personalized precision care. This review underscores the importance of establishing clear aims, defined rules, and fostering effective and well tolerated teamwork with accurate feedback for improving patient-reported outcomes. The Safe Brain Initiative approach, emphasizing algorithmic monitoring and systematic follow-up, is crucial in implementing a fundamental and standardized reporting approach within patient-centered anesthesia care practice.Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

43 keywords...

hide…