• Ann. Intern. Med. · Jun 2024

    Randomized Controlled Trial

    Extracorporeal Shock-Wave Lithotripsy and Endoscopy for the Treatment of Pain in Chronic Pancreatitis : A Sham-Controlled, Randomized Trial.

    • Rupjyoti Talukdar, Søren S Olesen, Misbah Unnisa, Akshay Bedarkar, Subhaleena Sarkar, Manu Tandan, Nitin Jagtap, Santosh Darisetty, Sekhramantri Kiran, Vinod Koppoju, Sundeep Lakhtakia, Mohan Ramchandani, Rakesh Kalapala, Rajesh Gupta, Vikesh K Singh, Guduru Venkat Rao, Duvvur Nageshwar Reddy, and Asbjørn M Drewes.
    • Department of Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, Telangana, India (R.T., M.U., A.B., S.S., M.T., N.J., S.L., M.R., R.K., R.G., D.N.R.).
    • Ann. Intern. Med. 2024 Jun 1; 177 (6): 749758749-758.

    BackgroundNo randomized controlled trials have substantiated endoscopic decompression of the pancreatic duct in patients with painful chronic pancreatitis.ObjectiveTo investigate the pain-relieving effect of pancreatic duct decompression in patients with chronic pancreatitis and intraductal stones.Design24-week, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03966781).SettingAsian Institute of Gastroenterology in India from February 2021 to July 2022.Participants106 patients with chronic pancreatitis.InterventionCombined extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP) compared with sham procedures.MeasurementsThe primary end point was pain relief on a 0- to 10-point visual analog scale (VAS) at 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes were assessed after 12 and 24 weeks and included 30% pain relief, opioid use, pain-free days, questionaries, and complications to interventions.Results52 patients in the ESWL/ERP group and 54 in the sham group were included. At 12 weeks, the ESWL/ERP group showed better pain relief compared with the sham group (mean difference in change, -0.7 [95% CI, -1.3 to 0] on the VAS; P = 0.039). The difference between groups was not sustained at the 24-week follow-up, and no differences were seen for 30% pain relief at 12- or 24-week follow-up. The number of pain-free days was increased (median difference, 16.2 days [CI, 3.9 to 28.5 days]), and the number of days using opioids was reduced (median difference, -5.4 days [CI, -9.9 to -0.9 days]) in the ESWL/ERP group compared with the sham group at 12-week follow-up. Safety outcomes were similar between groups.LimitationSingle-center study and limited duration of follow-up.ConclusionIn patients with chronic pancreatitis and intraductal stones, ESWL with ERP provided modest short-term pain relief.Primary Funding SourceAsian Institute of Gastroenterology and Aalborg University Hospital.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.