• Dean R Hess.
• Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts dhess@aarc.org.
• Respir Care. 2024 Jul 24; 69 (8): 103310411033-1041.

AbstractPulse oximetry is arguably the most impactful monitor ever introduced into respiratory care practice. Recently there has been increased attention to the problem of occult hypoxemia in which patients are hypoxemic despite an acceptable SpO2 Although occult hypoxemia might be greater in Black patients than white patients, it is not insignificant in whites. In a given population of patients, the bias between SpO2 and arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2 ) might be close to zero. However, the limits of agreement can be wide, meaning that SpO2 might overestimate SaO2 in many individual patients, which can result in occult hypoxemia in some. Manufactures report accuracy of SpO2 derived from normal individuals, which might differ from that in the clinical setting. That SpO2 overestimates SaO2 in an important number of individuals has caused some to recommend higher SpO2 targets to avoid occult hypoxemia. There is also evidence that suggests that SpO2 might not accurately trend SaO2 Additional research is needed to investigate strategies to mitigate the bias between SpO2 and SaO2 Clinicians must be cognizant of the limitations of pulse oximetry when clinically using SpO2 The aim of this paper is to provide an update on pulse oximetry.Copyright © 2024 by Daedalus Enterprises.

15 keywords...

hide…