• World Neurosurg · Sep 2024

    Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study

    Leukocyte- and Platelet-Rich Fibrin versus commercially available fibrin sealants in elective cranial surgery: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

    • Birgit Coucke, Liesbeth Gilissen, Jeroen Luyten, Johannes van Loon, Laura Van Gerven, and Tom Theys.
    • Department of Neurosciences, Research Group Experimental Neurosurgery and Neuroanatomy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Microbiology and Transplantation, Research Group Allergy and Clinical Immunology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. Electronic address: Birgit.coucke@kuleuven.be.
    • World Neurosurg. 2024 Sep 1; 189: 220227220-227.

    BackgroundPrevious findings from a clinical trial demonstrated noninferiority of Leukocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) compared to commercially available fibrin sealants in preventing postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage, necessitating intervention. This cost-effectiveness evaluation aims to assess the value-for-money of both techniques for dural closure in supratentorial and infratentorial surgeries.MethodsCost-effectiveness was estimated from a health care payer's perspective alongside a randomized clinical trial comprising 328 patients. The analysis focused on clinical and health-related quality of life outcomes, as well as direct medical costs including inpatient costs, imaging and laboratory costs, and outpatient follow up costs up to twelve weeks after surgery.ResultsClinical and health-related quality of life data showed no significant differences between L-PRF (EuroQol five dimensions questionnaire 0.75 ± 0.25, 36-item Short Form Survey 63.93% ± 20.42) and control (EuroQol five dimensions questionnaire 0.72 ± 0.22, 36-item Short Form Survey 60.93% ± 20.78) groups. Pharmaceutical expenses during initial hospitalization were significantly lower in the L-PRF group (€190.4, interquartile range 149.9) than in the control group (€394.4, interquartile range 364.3), while other cost categories did not show any significant differences, resulting in an average cost advantage of €204 per patient favoring L-PRF.ConclusionsThis study demonstrates L-PRF as a cost-effective alternative for commercially available fibrin sealants in dural closure. Implementing L-PRF can lead to substantial cost savings, particularly considering the frequency of these procedures.Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…