• Ann. Intern. Med. · Jul 2024

    Trends in Diet Quality Among U.S. Adults From 1999 to 2020 by Race, Ethnicity, and Socioeconomic Disadvantage.

    • Junxiu Liu and Dariush Mozaffarian.
    • Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York (J.L.).
    • Ann. Intern. Med. 2024 Jul 1; 177 (7): 841850841-850.

    BackgroundFew data have assessed trends in diet quality among U.S. adults.ObjectiveTo evaluate trends in diet quality by race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic disadvantage.DesignRepeated cross-sectional study.SettingUnited States.ParticipantsNoninstitutionalized adults aged 20 years or older who responded to the 1999-2020 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES).MeasurementsThe proportion of participants meeting the targets of the validated American Heart Association (AHA) 2020 continuous diet score (based on higher intake of fruits, vegetables, whole grains, fish and shellfish, and nuts, seeds, and legumes and lower intake of sugar-sweetened beverages, processed meat, saturated fat, and sodium) and the Healthy Eating Index (HEI)-2015, and energy-adjusted consumption of their components and other individual food groups and nutrients. Poor diet was defined as less than 40% adherence to the AHA score, intermediate as 40% to 79.9% adherence, and ideal as at least 80% adherence.ResultsA total of 51 703 adults were included. From 1999 to 2020, the proportion of U.S. adults with poor diet quality decreased from 48.8% to 37.4% (difference, -11.4 percentage points [95% CI, -16.8 to -5.96 percentage points]), the proportion with intermediate quality increased from 50.6% to 61.1% (difference, 10.5 percentage points [CI, 5.20 to 16.1 percentage points]), and the proportion with ideal quality increased from 0.66% to 1.58% (difference, 0.93 percentage points [CI, 0.35 to 1.51 percentage points]) (P for trend < 0.001 for each). Persistent or worsening disparities in diet quality were observed by age, sex, race and ethnicity, education, income, food security, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program participation, and health insurance coverage. For example, the proportion of adults with poor diet quality decreased from 47.9% to 33.0% among those with food security (P for trend < 0.001) but did not change (51.3% to 48.2%) among those experiencing food insecurity (P for trend = 0.140) (P for interaction = 0.001). Findings were similar for HEI-2015.LimitationsSelf-reported diet; cross-sectional study design.ConclusionDiet quality among U.S. adults improved modestly between 1999 and 2020, but the proportion with poor diet quality remains high, and dietary disparities persist or are worsening.Primary Funding SourceNational Institutes of Health.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.