• Burns · Nov 2024

    The minimal important change (MIC) and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the patient and observer scar assessment scale (POSAS) 2.0.

    • Catherine M Legemate, Esther Middelkoop, Michelle E Carrière, van ZuijlenPaul P MPPMDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Vrije Univeristeit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Burn Center and Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Red, van BaarMargriet EMEDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Association of Dutch Burn Centres, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands., Cornelis H van der Vlies, and Hycon Study group.
    • Burn Centre, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Vrije Univeristeit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Electronic address: c.legemate@amsterdamumc.nl.
    • Burns. 2024 Nov 1; 50 (8): 207020762070-2076.

    BackgroundThe Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) is frequently used to assess scar quality after burns. It is important to be aware of the minimal important change (MIC) and the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) to establish if a POSAS score represents a clinically relevant change or difference. The aim of this study is to explore the MIC and MCID of POSAS version 2.0.MethodsThis prospective study included 127 patients with deep dermal burns that underwent split thickness skin grafting with a mean age of 44 years (range 0 - 87) and total body surface area burned of 10 % (range 0.5 - 55). POSAS data was obtained for one burn scar area at three, six, and 12 months after split skin grafting. At the second and third visits, patients rated the degree of clinical change in scar quality in comparison to the previous visit. At 12 months, they completed the POSAS for a second burn scar area and rated the degree of clinical difference between the two scar areas. Two anchor-based methods were used to determine the MIC and MCID.ResultsMIC values of the patient POSAS ranged from - 0.59 to - 0.29 between three and six months and from - 0.75 to - 0.38 between six and 12 months follow-up. Both had a poor discriminatory value. MCID values ranged from - 0.39 and - 0.08, with a better discriminatory value.ConclusionResults suggest that patients consider minor differences (less than 0.75 on the 1-10 scale) in POSAS scores as clinically important scar quality changes. MCID values can be used to evaluate the effects of burn treatment and perform sample-size calculations.Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…