• Per D Trobisch, Hong Jin Kim, Bastian Himpe, and Dong-Gune Chang.
• Department of Spine Surgery, Eifelklinik St. Brigida, Simmerath, Germany. pertrobisch@gmail.com.
• Eur Spine J. 2024 Jul 1; 33 (7): 273427412734-2741.

PurposeVertebral Body Tethering (VBT) has been shown to have a less predictable outcome compared to spinal fusion in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Tether breakage is a common mechanical event that sometimes leads to loss of correction. No data has been published that evaluates the outcome of re-tethering in patients who underwent revision surgery for failed VBT, which was the purpose of this study.MethodsThis is an analysis of a prospectively collected single center database of 290 patients who have had VBT. Patients for this study were included if they have had re-tethering after failed VBT and a minimum follow up of 24 months after index surgery as well as a minimum follow up of 12 months after revision surgery. Revision surgeries included tether exchange, tether reinforcement and/or mono- and bisegmental lateral fusion. Main outcome of interest was curve magnitude at latest follow up.Results11 patients were identified who received VBT for 16 curves of which 13 curves have had failed index surgery. Mean follow up from index surgery was 40 months, time between index and revision surgery was 22 months and latest follow up after revision surgery 19 months. Re-tethering resulted in an additional correction of 42% for thoracic and 63% for thoracolumbar curves. These results remained clinically stable with only minor loss of correction at final follow up. No patient underwent or was indicated for spinal fusion.ConclusionRe-tethering is feasible and able to achieve additional correction and a sustainable result.© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

23 keywords...

hide…