• Khaled Sarhan, Rana Walaa, Ahmed Hasanin, Manal Elgohary, Ramy Alkonaiesy, Kareem Nawwar, Mohamed Elsonbaty, and Ahmad Elsonbaty.
• Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.
• Paediatr Anaesth. 2024 Oct 1; 34 (10): 104510521045-1052.

BackgroundThe efficacy and safety of cuffed endotracheal tubes (ETTs) in neonates are still unclear, this study aimed to assess the efficacy of cuffed versus uncuffed ETTs in neonate undergoing noncardiac surgeries.MethodsNeonates scheduled for noncardiac surgeries were randomized into two groups according to the type of airway device during general anesthesia: cuffed ETT group (n = 60) and the uncuffed ETT group (n = 60). The primary outcome was the incidence of ETT exchange to find the appropriate ETT. Other outcomes included: duration of intubation, lung ultrasound score, and incidence of postoperative complications (croup, wheezes, hypoxia, etc.).ResultsThe frequency of ETT exchange was lower in the cuffed ETT group compared to the uncuffed one {1 (1.7%) vs. 28 (46.7%), p = .0001; relative risk [95% confidence interval]: 0.54 [0.43-0.69]}. Postoperative adverse events were comparable between both groups except for significantly higher post extubation croup in the uncuffed ETT group compared to the cuffed ETT {10 (16.7%) vs. 3(5%), p value = .04, relative risk (95% confidence interval): 1.14 (1-1.29)}.ConclusionIn full term neonates undergoing noncardiac surgeries, the use of cuffed ETT was associated with less need to tracheal tube exchange and less incidence of postoperative croup, without increasing the postoperative respiratory complications compared to uncuffed ETT.© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

24 keywords...

hide…