• Abha A Gupta, Wei Xue, Douglas J Harrison, Douglas S Hawkins, Roshni Dasgupta, Suzanne Wolden, Barry Shulkin, Amira Qumseya, Jonathan C Routh, Tamara MacDonald, Shari Feinberg, Brian Crompton, Erin R Rudzinski, Michael Arnold, and Raj Venkatramani.
• Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. Electronic address: abha.gupta@uhn.ca.
• Lancet Oncol. 2024 Jul 1; 25 (7): 912921912-921.

BackgroundThe Children's Oncology Group defines intermediate-risk rhabdomyosarcoma as unresected FOXO1 fusion-negative disease arising at an unfavourable site or non-metastatic FOXO1 fusion-positive disease. Temsirolimus in combination with chemotherapy has shown promising activity in patients with relapsed or refractory rhabdomyosarcoma. We aimed to compare event-free survival in patients with intermediate-risk rhabdomyosarcoma treated with vincristine, actinomycin, and cyclophosphamide alternating with vincristine and irinotecan (VAC/VI) combined with temsirolimus followed by maintenance therapy versus VAC/VI alone with maintenance therapy.MethodsARST1431 was a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial conducted across 210 institutions in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the USA. Eligible patients were those aged 40 years or younger with non-metastatic FOXO1-positive rhabdomyosarcoma or unresected FOXO1-negative rhabdomyosarcoma disease from unfavourable sites. Two other groups of patients were also eligible: those who had FOXO1-negative disease at a favourable site (excluding orbit) that was unresected; and those who were aged younger than 10 years with stage IV FOXO1-negative disease with distant metastases. Eligible patients had to have a Lansky performance status score of 50 or higher if 16 years or younger and a Karnofsky performance status score of 50 or higher if older than 16 years; all patients were previously untreated. Patients were randomised (1:1) in blocks of four and stratified by histology, stage, and group. Patients received intravenous VAC/VI chemotherapy with a cyclophosphamide dose of 1·2 g/m2 per dose per cycle with or without a reducing dose of intravenous weekly temsirolimus starting at 15 mg/m2 or 0·5 mg/kg per dose for those who weighed less than 10 kg. The total duration of therapy was 42 weeks followed by 6 months of maintenance therapy with oral cyclophosphamide plus intravenous vinorelbine for all patients. Temsirolimus was withheld during radiotherapy and for 2 weeks before any major surgical procedure. The primary endpoint was 3-year event-free survival. Data were analysed with a revised intention-to-treat approach. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02567435) and is complete.FindingsBetween May 23, 2016, and Jan 1, 2022, 325 patients were enrolled. In 297 evaluable patients (148 assigned to VAC/VI alone and 149 assigned to VAC/VI with temsirolimus), the median age was 6·3 years (IQR 3·0-11·3); 33 (11%) patients were aged 18 years or older; 179 (60%) of 297 were male. 113 (77%) of 148 patients were FOXO1 negative in the VAC/VI group, and 108 (73%) of 149 were FOXO1 negative in the VAC/VI with temsirolimus group. With a median follow-up of 3·6 years (IQR 2·8-4·5), 3-year event-free survival did not differ significantly between the two groups (64·8% [95% CI 55·5-74·1] in the VAC/VI group vs 66·8% [57·5-76·2] in the VAC/VI plus temsirolimus group (hazard ratio 0·86 [95% CI 0·58-1·26]; log-rank p=0·44). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were anaemia (62 events in 60 [41%] of 148 patients in the VAC/VI group vs 89 events in 87 [58%] of 149 patients in the VAC/VI with temsirolimus group), lymphopenia (83 events in 65 [44%] vs 99 events in 71 [48%]), neutropenia (160 events in 99 [67%] vs 164 events in 105 [70%]), and leukopenia (121 events in 86 [58%] vs 132 events in 93 [62%]). There was one treatment-related death in the VAC/VI with temsirolimus group, categorised as not otherwise specified.InterpretationAddition of temsirolimus to VAC/VI did not improve event-free survival in patients with intermediate-risk rhabdomyosarcoma defined by their FOXO1 translocation status and clinical factors. Novel biology-based strategies are needed to improve outcomes in this population.FundingThe Children's Oncology Group (supported by the US National Cancer Institute, US National Institutes of Health).Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.

33 keywords...

hide…