• Xiaojuan Zhang, Xiaodong Cheng, Bing Yin, Jianzhao Wang, Sheng Li, Guobin Liu, Zusheng Hu, Weiwei Wu, and Yingze Zhang.
• Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University.
• Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Aug 1; 98 (34): e16898e16898.

AbstractBoth spiral plate and Herbert screw fixations have been clinically adopted for treating midshaft displaced clavicle fractures. However, the biomechanical properties of the 2 implant fixations have not yet been thoroughly evaluated. Here we report the results of a finite element analysis of the biomechanical properties of midshaft clavicle fractures treated with Herbert screw and spiral plate fixation. Hebert screw fixation showed stress distribution similar to intact clavicle under all loading conditions, but provided less stability than did spiral plate fixation. Postoperatively, excessive shoulder activities and weight-bearing should be avoided. Spiral plate fixation provides greater stability, but is associated with stress shielding. These results demonstrate that Herbert screw fixation is suitable for the treatment of simple displaced clavicluar fractures, but excessive shoulder activity and weight-bearing should be avoided after the operation. Therefore, spiral plate fixation may be preferred for patients requiring an early return to activity.

22 keywords...

hide…