• J Hosp Med · Jul 2018

    Observational Study

    Shared Decision-Making During Inpatient Rounds: Opportunities for Improvement in Patient Engagement and Communication.

    • Rebecca Blankenburg, Joan F Hilton, Patrick Yuan, Stephanie Rennke, Brad Monash, Stephanie M Harman, Debbie S Sakai, Poonam Hosamani, Adeena Khan, Ian Chua, Eric Huynh, Lisa Shieh, and Lijia Xie.
    • Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA. rblanke@stanford.edu.
    • J Hosp Med. 2018 Jul 1; 13 (7): 453461453-461.

    BackgroundShared decision-making (SDM) improves patient engagement and may improve outpatient health outcomes. Little is known about inpatient SDM.ObjectiveTo assess overall quality, provider behaviors, and contextual predictors of SDM during inpatient rounds on medicine and pediatrics hospitalist services.DesignA 12-week, cross-sectional, single-blinded observational study of team SDM behaviors during rounds, followed by semistructured patient interviews.SettingTwo large quaternary care academic medical centers.ParticipantsThirty-five inpatient teams (18 medicine, 17 pediatrics) and 254 unique patient encounters (117 medicine, 137 pediatrics).InterventionObservational study.MeasurementsWe used a 9-item Rochester Participatory Decision-Making Scale (RPAD) measured team-level SDM behaviors. Same-day interviews using a modified RPAD assessed patient perceptions of SDM.ResultsCharacteristics associated with increased SDM in the multivariate analysis included the following: service, patient gender, timing of rounds during patient's hospital stay, and amount of time rounding per patient (P < .05). The most frequently observed behaviors across all services included explaining the clinical issue and matching medical language to the patient's level of understanding. The least frequently observed behaviors included checking understanding of the patient's point of view, examining barriers to follow-through, and asking if the patient has any questions. Patients and guardians had substantially higher ratings for SDM quality compared to peer observers (7.2 vs 4.4 out of 9).ConclusionsImportant opportunities exist to improve inpatient SDM. Team size, number of learners, patient census, and type of decision being made did not affect SDM, suggesting that even large, busy services can perform SDM if properly trained.© 2018 Society of Hospital Medicine

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.