• Image J Nurs Sch · Jan 1989

    Technology versus clinical evaluation for fluid management decisions in CABG patients.

    • M G Pierson and M Funk.
    • Image J Nurs Sch. 1989 Jan 1;21(4):192-5.

    AbstractAn exploratory study was designed to determine whether data made available by a pulmonary artery catheter or data obtained by nonivasive clinical evaluation were used as a basis for fluid management decisions in stable coronary artery bypass graft patients approximately 18 hours postoperatively and beyond. The sample consisted of 40 fluid management decisions made on 33 patients. The data were collected on all of the factors that influenced the decision. In no instance was information provided by the pulmonary artery catheter used as a basis for a fluid management decision; only noninvasive clinical measures were influential. The study questions the prolonged use of this medical technology with its attendant cost and risk. Nurses' roles in managing technology are highlighted.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…