• Stephanie A Hooker, Leif I Solberg, Kathleen M Miley, Caitlin M Borgert-Spaniol, and Rebecca C Rossom.
• From the HealthPartners Institute, Research and Evaluation Division, Minneapolis, MN (SAH, LIM, KMM, CMB, RCR). stephanie.a.hooker@healthpartners.com.
• J Am Board Fam Med. 2024 Aug 14; 37 (3): 389398389-398.

PurposeClinical decision support (CDS) tools are designed to help primary care clinicians (PCCs) implement evidence-based guidelines for chronic disease care. CDS tools may also be helpful for opioid use disorder (OUD), but only if PCCs use them in their regular workflow. This study's purpose was to understand PCC and clinic leader perceptions of barriers to using an OUD-CDS tool in primary care.MethodsPCCs and leaders (n = 13) from clinics in an integrated health system in which an OUD-CDS tool was implemented participated in semistructured qualitative interviews. Questions aimed to understand whether the CDS tool design, implementation, context, and content were barriers or facilitators to using the OUD-CDS in primary care. Recruitment stopped when thematic saturation was reached. An inductive thematic analysis approach was used to generate overall themes.ResultsFive themes emerged: (1) PCCs prefer to minimize conversations about OUD risk and treatment; (2) PCCs are enthusiastic about a CDS tool that addresses a topic of interest but lack interest in treating OUD; (3) contextual barriers in primary care limit PCCs' ability to use CDS to manage OUD; (4) CDS needs to be simple and visible, save time, and add value to care; and (5) CDS has value in identifying and screening patients and facilitating referrals.ConclusionsThis study identified several factors that impact use of an OUD-CDS tool in primary care, including PCC interest in treating OUD, contextual barriers, and CDS design. These results may help others interested in implementing CDS for OUD in primary care.© Copyright 2024 by the American Board of Family Medicine.

21 keywords...

hide…